Compare sovereign wealth funds
Every profile on this site follows the same layout, so any two funds can be read side by side: fact box, mandate, funding source, leaders, investments, the 10 transparency items and sources. Each fact has a source and a date.
The pairs people ask about most:
| Pair | The key difference in one line |
|---|---|
| GIC and Temasek | GIC manages Singapore's reserves and does not own them; Temasek is an investment company that owns its portfolio |
| ADIA and QIA | Neither publishes its total assets, so both sizes are outside estimates |
| PIF and Mubadala | PIF reports both assets under management and a larger consolidated total; Mubadala reports assets under management |
| Norway's fund and CPP Investments | Norway's fund saves petroleum revenue; CPP Investments manages pension money |
| CIC and SAFE Investment Company | CIC is a core national fund; we group SAFE Investment Company with central bank reserve arms |
| Alaska and Texas | Alaska pays a yearly dividend to residents; the Texas fund supports public schools |
Size comparisons need special care. If two funds report on different bases, for example one an audited portfolio value and the other an outside estimate, the numbers do not line up. A gap between two figures can be a gap in disclosure, not a gap in size. Our study why published sizes of sovereign funds differ explains the four usual reasons.
Disclaimer
Informational only. SovereignWealthFunds.com is an independent public-source reference. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by any fund named on it, and it is not investment, legal or tax advice. Figures are as of the dates shown next to them and may have changed; please read each fund's official pages, linked on its profile. To report an error, use the contact page. Copyright SovereignWealthFunds.com. All rights reserved.
